Whitepaper: Evolution from EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 to EN 12942:2023

EN 12942 specifies the requirements, testing, and marking for powered filtering respiratory protective devices (PAPR) incorporating full face masks, half masks or quarter masks (tight-fitting respiratory interfaces).

The 2023 edition replaces EN 12942:1998 + A2:2008 and represents a major technical and structural revision aligning with modern ISO 16900-series methodologies, updated terminology, and EU Regulation 2016/425 for PPE conformity assessment.

This whitepaper summarises the key structural, technical, and procedural differences, their implications for manufacturers, and testing laboratories seeking compliance with the 2023 standard.

Structural and Terminological Updates

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: structural and terminological updates comparison table

Classification Table Changes

Both versions retain TM1, TM2, TM3 classifications based on inward leakage performance and particle penetration limits. There are no changes in maximum inward leakage limits.

The 2023 revision extends coverage with Hg P (Mercury), and NO P (Nitrogen oxides) filters are now permitted across all classes (TH1–TH3).

Table 1 in 2023 also explicitly distinguishes inward leakage (IL) for gas filter systems vs total inward leakage (TIL) for combined and particle systems.

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: classification table changes comparison table

Scope Refinement

Key Changes in European Foreword

The European Foreword of EN 12942:2023 lists the principal technical changes (items a–m). Below is a deep dive into each with commentary.

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: key changes in european foreword comparison table

Specific Requirement Comparisons

Air Supply and Flow Rate

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: air supply and flow rate comparison table

Implication: manufacturers must clearly define whether their minimum design condition is a flowrate, or some other condition. Manufacturers must be aware of the new requirement that minimum design condition must be met or exceeded 5 minutes after the low energy alarm activation.

Electrical aspects

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: electrical aspects comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must be aware of the change.

Mechanical strength

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: mechanical strength comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers designing their product for rugged applications have a specific clause to test to, to demonstrate the durability of their product. Additional marking privileges are conferred.

Resistance to temperature

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: resistance to temperature comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must be aware of the change, and consider what impact this may have on the materials used in the construction of their devices.

Inward Leakage (IL/TIL)

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: inward leakage (il/til) comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must be aware of the need to test with SF6 if their system uses gas or combination filters.

Practical Performance and Ergonomics

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: practical performance and ergonomics comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must be aware of the more demanding test conditions and new requirements, and what impacts these may have on the performance and usability of the device.

Materials and Risk Assessment

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: materials and risk assessment comparison table

Implication: manufacturers must submit a suitable declaration at the time of testing to confirm that such an assessment has been made.

Noise level testing

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: noise level testing comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must be aware of the change in test method and the implications of testing with a dummy head, rather than a human test subject.

Marking and information

EN 12942:1998+A2:2008 versus EN 12942:2023: marking and information comparison table

Implication: Manufacturers must review label artwork, packaging layouts and instructions for use to align with these new graphical requirements.

 

Conclusion

EN 12942:2023 represents a major modernization of PAPR standards, aligning with the ISO 16900 family and the EU PPE Regulation 2016/425.

Manufacturers must adapt not only to new testing protocols but also to process-oriented expectations such as documented risk assessments, harmonized flow corrections, and enhanced marking clarity. By implementing these updates early, manufacturers can ensure compliance, future-proof product certification, and maintain access to both EU CE and UKCA markets.

 

If you have questions as to how these changes affect you, why not Get in Touch to discuss this with our team.